Public
Comments on the "Consultation Paper on the Review on Administration
and Assignment of Internet Domain Names and Internet Protocol Addresses
in Hong Kong"
| Reference
No. |
|
: |
|
DN22 |
| Date
of Submission |
|
: |
|
15.7.2000 |
| Submitted
by |
|
: |
|
Mr
Fung Kin Ming |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject: comments towards .hk name consultation paper
Dear
ITBB: my personal humble opinions, totally independent from my
employer and institutions:
> c.
the corporation should be spun off from the JUCC initially, with
> an interim Board comprising directors from the academia, the
> industry and the Government;
the
corporation should be started as soon as possible:
- JUCC
should not be represented more than other sectors, and her role
should diminish to a minority weight within a year.
Afterall,
academics don't play a major role in the internet anymore;
- the new corporation needs time to train her staff, and write and
tune
her own software from scratch; give them at least 3 months
after
incorporation for preparations before taking on real registrations;
> i.
the JUCC should continue to provide registration services in
> respect of the .edu.hk domain;
only
if the education sectors of HK show approval; we should not
automatically assume JUCC knows who is and who is not an educational
institution. Definition of such always have a lot of grey
areas.
Default should be to let edu.hk be treated like com/org/net.hk,
unless the HK education sectors express their wishes to be otherwise;
> k.
the registrar responsible for .com.hk, .org.hk and .net.hk domain
> names may engage agents to perform some of the routine registration
work;
to
avoid conflict of interest, such agents must not be affiliated
with ISPs or webhosting companies, otherwise the impartiality of
such agents will be questioned if their affiliated ISP competes
with another ISP (who has no agents) to register a name.
> l.a
reserved list of domain names consisting of well-known
> international trademarks, service marks and brand names as well
as
> some other names which are of restricted use, making reference
to
> the reserved lists prepared by other ccTLD registration authorities,
> may be drawn up;
better
default to no such list, unless we know how the list is made up,
and who has the power to change it. Danger of having no such
list is
small.
> p.each
organisation should be allowed to register more than one
> domain name under .hk;
but
only for a small number of names; many names for each organization
will result in hogging of names, whether or not they can be transferred
to other organizations later;
> q.the
transfer of domain names on valid grounds should be allowed;
commercial
relationships between tranfer parties can be extremely
complex, and it will be totally impossible for HKNIC (old or new)
to
draw up a satisfactory list of acceptable reasons for transfer.
This
"on valid grounds" clause is a time-bomb that will surely create
lots of
heated arguments. Let organizations transfer names whenever
they want.
Cybersquatting needs to be defeated by other means. Even if
you don't
allow transfer, companies will still hog lots of name, because you
cannot tell/convince everyone that their names may not be transferrable.
> r.only
companies and organisations registered or incorporated in
> Hong Kong should be allowed to register domain names ending with
> .hk initially;
delete
the word "initially"; .hk names are like +852 numbers. Why
should we let a US company register hkfood.com.hk (e.g.) so HK companies
cannot use it? If they want to do business in HK, let them
register in
HK, and use that HK identity to register .hk names.
> t.domain
names should be subject to renewal at a fee;
very
needed, and should be applicable to names already registered;
> v.an
alternative dispute resolution mechanism should be developed
> in Hong Kong to facilitate early resolution of .hk domain name
> disputes
The
new HKNIC should give a reasonable timeframe (e.g. 6 months) to
develop such mechanisms.
Others:
we might approach the Business Registry to seek their
opinion on whether they want to be the registry (or an agent) for
com.hk names, which by nature are nothing more than Business names
or labels. We might need legislation to achieve that purpose,
but be
assured that the technical part is the easy part: all that is needed:
3
more fields in a Business Registration Certificate: domain name,
nameserver1, and nameserver2.
Advantage:
every business knows how to do business registration, so they
will know immediately know how to register com.hk names, and save
them a
lot of time. We can also mimic the mechanism to resolve who
is most
eligible for a particular business name, and try to apply it towards
com.hk names, and this can solve a worldwide headache problem: who
is
the most appropriate party for a particular business name.
Thanks
for you very nice consulation paper. Go for it. --kinming--
/ ==#=i __ #===# kinming Fung
/ ===#=|= # # #___# representing himself only in these opinions
/ # ==7 ==#=| #==# # # and not reflecting positions at all, of
# / ==#== #__# #---# Chinese University of Hongkong
# =\ ==#== / # and other institutions
# =/ \======/ / \#
|